Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting Inputs on Draft Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies

Inviting Inputs on Draft Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies
Start Date :
Sep 09, 2020
Last Date :
Sep 30, 2020
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET) was notified as an overarching skills regulator on 5th December 2018 vide notification No. SD-17/113/2017-E&PW ...

The National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET) was notified as an overarching skills regulator on 5th December 2018 vide notification No. SD-17/113/2017-E&PW

The NCVET will regulate the functioning of entities engaged in vocational education and training, both long & short-term, and establish minimum standards for the functioning of such entities.

Pursuing its mandate, NCVET has developed a draft of the ‘Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies’. These guidelines are an attempt to standardize operations and outcomes of the Awarding Bodies (ABs) in the skills ecosystem. This will lead to improvement in quality and market relevance of skill development programs lending credibility to vocational education and training, encouraging greater private investment and employer participation in the skills space.
Guidelines define scope, criteria, tenure and detailed process of recognition as an AB. A robust mechanism of monitoring and evaluation based on well-defined parameters forms integral part of the guidelines.
The AB guidelines are structured as eligibility criteria and continuance criteria. The eligibility criteria ensures that ABs demonstrate required sustainable capacity earmarking the basic minimal organizational requirements and necessities. The continuation criteria ensures continuity of an awarding body based on its performance against the monitoring and evaluation parameters.

Comments are invited from public on the proposed guidelines.

Click here to read ‘Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies’

Last date of submission is 30th September 2020

Reset
Showing 405 Submission(s)
Vishal Kumar Mishra
Vishal Kumar Mishra 5 years 9 months ago
There should be a central portal where all certificate should be verified, like it can be verified on digilocker. This is possible only if it's certificate is given up code number. This would also reduce the risk of fraudulent certificates. As far as award giving is concerned it should not be based on who beats whom but should be based on who steps forward and expresses theself the best.
Dr.Rudra Mihira
Dr.Rudra Mihira 5 years 9 months ago
Awards were awarded for knowledge and their own invention came from their efforts, this awarding bodies must considered because as a nation all are equal and all are human being for example anyone can achieve anything at any time depending on their focus inner strength and courage which comes from stability of mind, so small child can achieve a big thing so it must be awarded but this identification is really difficult and more over awards has many dimensions and it is depend on your views
GURUSANKARAN L
GURUSANKARAN L 5 years 9 months ago
First if all Awarding bodies are freely functioning in their sector without any Political Pressure that is more important and then the Members of the Awarding to equal priority in all States. This Awarding bodies head of the department is PrimeMinister, but the selection shall be the Board Members and the Recommended to the PM in Judges Panel of the Supreme Court. This is the correct way of the process.
Mahesh Ramnath Zade
Mahesh Ramnath Zade 5 years 9 months ago
muje trigeminal newrolgeya ka problem he , ye susaid disies he, jeske vjh se khana, Pina, bolna sab band, bhut seviyer pain hota he, to btav me emunit pawer kaise badhau... me handicap hu bhut kamjor bhi hu
Mahesh Ramnath Zade
Mahesh Ramnath Zade 5 years 9 months ago
muje trigeminal newrolgeya ka problem he , ye susaid disies he, jeske vjh se khana, Pina, bolna sab band, bhut seviyer pain hota he, to btav me emunit pawer kaise badhau...
SINGH RAJESH
SINGH RAJESH 5 years 9 months ago
SIR, THE ANOTHER PARAMETER FOR WHICH IS FOR RECOGNITION OF THE AWARDING BODIES IS THE FAIRNESS AND CLEANS OF THE HEALTH AS WELL AS THE WORK AND THERE WORK MUST NOT BE DISCLOSED TO RIVERA L OR WE CAN SAY THAT IN OTHER WORK THE COMPETITORS BY THERE EMPLOYEE NEEDED STRICT SUPERVISION, THE AWARD MUST BE GIVEN TO ON THE BASIS OF MERIT NOT THE BASIS OF MAJORITY AND THAT SHOULD BE ACCESSED BY THE BOSS. THANKS.
SINGH RAJESH
SINGH RAJESH 5 years 9 months ago
SIR, SOME TIME WE HAVE TO GIVE TIME FOR SELF ASSESSMENT SO THAT THEY CAN IMPROVE THERE PERFORMANCE NEEDED GUIDANCE TO WHEN EVER THEY FEEL DIFFICULTY, THERE IS AN PHASE IN ENGLISH " NO BODY IS PERFECT" BUT AT THE SAME TIME THERE IS AN ANOTHER PHASE IN ENGLISH " PRACTICE MAKES MAN PERFECT ". WE ALL ONCE IN A LIFE FAIL SOME WHERE BUT THE GUIDANCE FROM TEACHERS AND SUPPORT FROM PARENTS GIVES AS TO POWER TO COME OUT OF ANY TROUBLE. THAT IS WHY TEACHER WAS, IS AND ALWAYS BE RESPECTED. THANKS.
SINGH RAJESH
SINGH RAJESH 5 years 9 months ago
SIR, GE, FOR "Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies" IS GIVEN BELOW AS PER MY PERSONAL OPINION, 1) DISCIPLINE, 2) INTEREST IN WORK, 3) HOW MUCH HE UNDERSTAND THE WORK AFTER THE COMPLETION OF WORK, 4) TIME TAKEN TO COMPLETE THE ASSIGN WORK, 5) THE ACCURACY OF THE WORK WHICH IS ASSIGN TO HIM, 6) IS END AS WELL AS INTERNAL CUSTOMER ARE SATISFIED, 7) IF ALL PARAMETER ARE SATISFIED THEN GIVE MARKS FOR OUR OF SIX MUST BE FIVE SO THAT THEY CARRY THE ACTIVITY IN FUTURE.