Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Inviting Inputs on Draft Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies

Inviting Inputs on Draft Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies
Start Date :
Sep 09, 2020
Last Date :
Sep 30, 2020
23:45 PM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

The National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET) was notified as an overarching skills regulator on 5th December 2018 vide notification No. SD-17/113/2017-E&PW ...

The National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET) was notified as an overarching skills regulator on 5th December 2018 vide notification No. SD-17/113/2017-E&PW

The NCVET will regulate the functioning of entities engaged in vocational education and training, both long & short-term, and establish minimum standards for the functioning of such entities.

Pursuing its mandate, NCVET has developed a draft of the ‘Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies’. These guidelines are an attempt to standardize operations and outcomes of the Awarding Bodies (ABs) in the skills ecosystem. This will lead to improvement in quality and market relevance of skill development programs lending credibility to vocational education and training, encouraging greater private investment and employer participation in the skills space.
Guidelines define scope, criteria, tenure and detailed process of recognition as an AB. A robust mechanism of monitoring and evaluation based on well-defined parameters forms integral part of the guidelines.
The AB guidelines are structured as eligibility criteria and continuance criteria. The eligibility criteria ensures that ABs demonstrate required sustainable capacity earmarking the basic minimal organizational requirements and necessities. The continuation criteria ensures continuity of an awarding body based on its performance against the monitoring and evaluation parameters.

Comments are invited from public on the proposed guidelines.

Click here to read ‘Guidelines for Recognition of the Awarding Bodies’

Last date of submission is 30th September 2020

Reset
Showing 405 Submission(s)
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
It has not been mentioned anywhere in these guidelines, what an institution will get after it is recognized as an Awarding body. It will get such recognition for profit making or just for contributing development in the country. If it will work for profit making, then it will try to exploit learners by hiking fees. Then, how the govt will check this?
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
Some measures should be taken at all ABs to enhance safety features like installing CCTVs, engaging adequate no of security guards, keeping fire extinguishers etc. Nothing like this has been mentioned in this guideline.
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
Though all Awarding bodies will have to make gender parity but there is no instruction in this guidelines regarding creation of anti sexual harassment cells at ABs. It should be make mandatory for all Awarding bodies to form anti sexual harassment cell to check such crimes on AB premises.
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
Why govt will deduct Rs 50,000 from Application fee deposited by an AB for getting registered? Is there any justification for this? On what basis such amount has been fixed? In my view , govt should refund all the money if it rejects the application. It should deduct money from the application fee only when it will be found that some forgery has been done by the institution to get recognition as Awarding body. Then only it can be justified as penalty.
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
There should not be two types of recognition system for Awarding bodies. Only one type of recognition system I.e. dual recognition should be introduced. If an Awarding body will not assess the learner's, then how and why it will provide certificate to them? It is not justified.
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN
ASHISH RANJAN SWAIN 5 years 9 months ago
Awarding bodies should not be allowed to prepare course or training material. If they are allowed to do so, then the course material prepared by awarding bodies in different states will differ from each other. Instead of this,NCVET should prepare the course material which should be applicable across the country. It will help in reducing gap between trainees in different states or institutions.